Attention Investors: Read This Before October 3rd


If you are not familiar with the new CFPB requirements you better get that way. Any closing involving a loan will be very different. As a real estate agent, investor, closer, attorney, etc., get ready. If you are prepared the transition will be much smoother.  As a result of these CFPB requirements taking effect October 3rd, the Far-Bar As-Is Contract all investors know and love has changed. The changes to be noted and things to consider are as follows:

I. When to use the new Far Bar As-Is Contract
The new Far-Bar should be used on any deal in which Buyer will be submitting an application for a loan on or after October 3rd . Keep in mind, “any loan” involves those loans with conventional financing. This does not apply to private or hard money loans.

II. What Has Changed
In order to keep this blog from being pages and pages long let me caveat this section by saying that I am giving the very short version of what has changed in each section. You must read the new Far Bar As-Is Contract in its entirety and take some continuing education courses if needed.

Extension of Closing Date in Paragraph 5
The closing date can be extended for not more than 10 days due to the newly mandated Closing Disclosure “CD” (what you used to call the “Settlement Statement”). The CD must be delivered a certain number of days prior to closing. If not, the close date may be extended to meet these new delivery requirements. 

Financing in Paragraph 8
a.     The language “or may obtain a loan…” in Paragraph 8a has been eliminated. Buyer can still change his mind and get a loan, but that Buyer will not be granted the closing extension mentioned in Paragraph 5 if the CD delivery requirements are not met.
b.     The time in which a buyer has to obtain a loan commitment has been extended to 45 days because it is expected that obtaining financing will be a longer process as of October 3rd when the new rules take effect.
c.     Just because you get an extension under Paragraph 5 does not mean you will get an extension for  the 7 days of close date requirement in Paragraph 8ii dealing with canceling the contract due to failure to obtain a loan commitment. 

      Closing Costs, Title Etc. of Paragraph 9
a.     The default time for delivering title commitment or evidence of title has been changed. If left blank and Paragraph 8(b), (c) or (d) is selected then the default time has been changed to 15 days prior to closing if left blank. Note: If you have selected Paragraph 8(a) the default time remains 5 days prior to close date.
b.     Paragraph 9(c) deals with the reporting of title insurance costs. The costs and rates are the same, but may be allocated differently on your Closing Disclosure due to new CFPB requirements
c.     Back to the tricky Paragraph 8. If you need a survey and chose Paragraph 8(a) the time in which you have to obtain that survey is still 5 days prior to closing. If you chose any other option in Paragraph 8 your new default time will be 15 days.

III. Other Changes to Far-Bar As-Is
There are a few other changes to the As-Is such as elimination of some addenda that never existed in the first place, abbreviated some changes etc., but the things listed above are your main changes and should be reviewed and noted for future use. 
Good Luck on October 3rd. A good title company, real estate attorney or agent should be able to make everything run smoothly. Surround yourself with these people and you’ll never even feel the ramifications of these new regulations. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Example of how House Bill 631 will help Buy and Hold Investors

The Florida Legislature Strengthens Laws to Remove Unwanted Parties from Your Property  The governor signed House Bill 631 into law on March 8, 2018, to update Florida law on ejectment, unlawful detainer, and customary use.   So what does this mean? First, let’s suppose the company owning the building next to yours puts up a fence ten feet over your property line, claiming to have a recorded deed to a strip of your land.  You think the deed is bogus.  To get rid of the fence you would likely file an “ejectment” action.  “Ejectment” is a kind of eviction action in which the party in possession claims a right to be there under a written instrument in its chain of title (usually a deed, easement, or other serious title instrument).  An ejectment action gives you the chance to prove your superior title to the property (after which you would  eject  the neighbor’s fence). Case closed.  The amendments to the Bill modernize the statute to ...
Read more

A Blog Series On Land Trusts: Intro

I firmly believe Land Trusts are one of the most misunderstood real estate investment tools nationwide. My plan it to make this a series of posts that will touch on what a land trust is and what it is not, clear up myths and misconceptions and pass along some tips and tricks. It will be basic, but if you understand the basics you can then start to get really specific and use them to cater to your particular investment portfolio.  I haven’t decided how many parts will be in the series so my plan is to just take one topic at a time and see where it leads. First, my back ground with these creatures: If I had to pick something that was “my thing” it would probably be Land Trusts. Never would I have  imagined when I graduated law school this would be the case, but about 6 years ago Debbie Farnell of Southeast Professional Title handed me Mark Warda’s book on the subject and my gears have been turning ever since. In those 6 years or so I have drafted hundreds of land tru...
Read more

Must Read For Florida Foreclosure Auction Investors

As promised, here are the cliff notes for a recent 4 th District Court of Appeals case that interpreted the Lis Pendens statute and how it applied to a foreclosure case. Warning: its super boring, dry, legal talk, but if you purchase foreclosure properties it is a MUST READ. The basic timeline for the facts of this case are as follows: -         Bank filed a Lis Pendens (LP)  against a property they were foreclosing. -      .  Sometime around September 2008 the bank obtained a final judgment -        Beginning in July of 2009 – October 2011 the Town recorded 7 liens against the property for various code violations. -        The house sold at auction in 2012. -         In 2013, James Ober, the winning bidder at foreclosure auction filed suit to quiet title, attempting to strike the Town liens against his property. The case trudged t...
Read more