Land Trust Series Part IV: The Negatives
I am the biggest advocate for land trusts you will
ever meet. I have successfully used them in so many scenarios that have made
deals, saved deals and killed deals (on purpose) that there is no way anyone is
going to successfully argue with me that land trusts are not one of the best
tools available for real estate
investors. Hands Down.
With that said, anyone that knows me will, I hope,
say that I am a pretty straight shooter. So, today, I am going to admit that
there are two sides to every coin and will discuss a few of the negatives.
Negative #1: Hazard insurance is more expensive when
property is held in a land trust. Some clients tell me the price
difference was enough to steer them away from land trusts completely while
others have said it wasn’t that big of an issue. I believe it all depends on
your agent. Like everyone else on your team, make sure your insurance agent is
investor friendly.
Negative #2: Some counties will require that an attorney
file an eviction on behalf of the trust. A pro
se action is when someone represents themselves in a case. This is fine.
However, in order to file a case on behalf of anyone other than yourself you
must be a licensed attorney. Technically, when a property is held in a land
trust the trust is a third party that must be represented by a licensed attorney.
The same would is true for property owned by corporate entities. An LLC cannot
represent itself; therefore, an attorney is required to represent that
corporate entity. Of course, I have seen plenty
of people file an eviction on behalf of their LLC. I think it just depends
on your county and the judge as to whether they push the issue and require
representation.
Negative #3: There is a misconception that you can’t
buy REO’s or short sales in a land trust. I should have put this under my last
blog entry which was the True or False one because this is no longer true. There was a time when some banks were not
accepting offers if the buyer was a land trust or corporate entity because they
didn’t like the idea of “flippers” buying their properties, but this practice
has almost completely disappeared. I actually don’t even remember the last time
I saw an offer rejected because a land trust was the buyer.
Negative #4: Property management can be a pain if your trustee doesn’t know what they
are doing. Since the trustee holds title, everything needs to go through the
trustee before anything can happen with the property (sign permits, contracts,
leases, field offers to purchase, etc). A good trustee will provide you with
documentation needed so that you don’t need to call their office every time
something comes up with your property. If I know the investment strategy or the
long term goal of the client I can provide the client a form that will allow
them to easily manage the property under pretty much all circumstances. It makes
my life and the clients’ life a lot easier.
These are the main complaints I hear from clients or
potential clients and I can completely fix them or at least make them less of a
head ache. So see, even the negatives aren’t that bad.
Comments
Post a Comment